Stakeholder exclusion practices of responsible leaders: an investigation into the application of responsible leader values in stakeholder inclusion and exclusion

ELLIS, Mark and DEAN, Dianne (2024). Stakeholder exclusion practices of responsible leaders: an investigation into the application of responsible leader values in stakeholder inclusion and exclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal.

Preview	PDF Ellis-StakeholderExclusionPracticesOfResponsibleLeaders(AM).pdf - Accepted Version Creative Commons Attribution. Download (345kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Figure 1) Ellis-StakeholderExclusionPracticesOfResponsibleLeaders(Figure1).pdf - Supplemental Material Creative Commons Attribution. Download (81kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Table 1) Ellis-StakeholderExclusionPracticesOfResponsibleLeaders(Table1).pdf - Supplemental Material Creative Commons Attribution. Download (129kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Table 2) Ellis-StakeholderExclusionPracticesOfResponsibleLeaders(Table2).pdf - Supplemental Material Creative Commons Attribution. Download (142kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to explore the stakeholder exclusion practices of responsible leaders. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive multiple case analyses of seven responsibly led organisations was employed. Twenty-two qualitative interviews were undertaken to investigate and understand perceptions and practice of responsible leaders and their approach to stakeholder inclusion and exclusion. Findings The findings revealed new and surprising insights where responsible leaders compromised their espoused values of inclusivity through the application of a personal bias, resulting in the exclusion of certain stakeholders. This exclusivity practice focused on the informal evaluation of potential stakeholders’ values, and where they did not align with those of the responsible leader, these stakeholders were excluded from participation with the organisation. This resulted in the creation and continuity of a culture of shared moral purpose across the organisation. Research limitations/implications This study focussed on responsible leader-led organisations, so the next stage of the research will include mainstream organisations (i.e. without explicit responsible leadership) to examine how personal values bias affects stakeholder selection in a wider setting. Practical implications The findings suggest that reflexive practice and critically appraising management methods in normative leadership approaches may lead to improvements in diversity management. Originality/value This paper presents original empirical data challenging current perceptions of responsible leader inclusivity practices and indicates areas of leadership development that may need to be addressed.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	1503 Business and Management; 1608 Sociology; 3505 Human resources and industrial relations; 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour; 4405 Gender studies
Identification Number:	https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-06-2023-0187
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Elements
Depositing User:	Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited:	03 Apr 2024 12:09
Last Modified:	03 Apr 2024 15:45
URI:	https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33519

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads

Publication Metrics