Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines

MCGRATH, Lisa (2016). Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 86-98. [Article]

Documents
11589:35392
[thumbnail of McGrath - Self-mentions in anthropology and history research.pdf]
Preview
PDF
McGrath - Self-mentions in anthropology and history research.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (317kB) | Preview
11589:35393
[thumbnail of Acceptance e-mail]
PDF (Acceptance e-mail)
Mcgrath - 11589.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (105kB)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the deployment of self-mentions in 18 history and 18 anthropology published research articles. ‘I’ was used more frequently in the anthropology articles than in history articles, a finding that can be traced to the knowledge-making practices of the disciplines. However, considerable intra-disciplinary variation was also observed, both in terms of frequency of self-mentions per article and the author roles adopted via the use of the first-person subject pronoun. Based on the results, I argue that there is a need to raise students' awareness of intra- as well as interdisciplinary variation in academic discourse, particularly in the humanities.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item