GRAHAM, Lorraine E., DATTA, Dipak, HELLER, Ben, HOWITT, John and PROS, Dip (2007). A comparative student of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 88 (6), 801-806. [Article]
Abstract
<p>Objective: To compare the results of gait analysis, timed
walking tests, and socket comfort for transfemoral amputees
wearing initially a Multiflex conventional prosthetic foot and
then a Vari-Flex energy-storing prosthetic foot.</p>
<p>
Design: Experimental crossover trial.</p>
<p>
Setting: A regional prosthetic and amputee rehabilitation
tertiary referral center in a teaching hospital.</p>
<p>
Participants: Six established unilateral transfemoral prosthetic
users.</p>
<p>
Interventions: Not applicable.</p>
<p>
Main Outcome Measures: Gait analysis, a timed walking
test, and a Prosthetic Socket Fit Comfort Score for each amputee
wearing the Multiflex foot and then repeated wearing the
Vari-Flex foot.</p>
<p>
Results: Wearing the Vari-Flex foot, our subjects walked
faster in the gait lab (1.38±0.13m/s, P<.001) and took more
equal step lengths at fast speed (1.063±0.05, P<.05). They
also had greater peak ankle dorsiflexion at push-off on the
prosthetic side (18.3°±4.73°, P<.001) and 3 times as much
power from the prosthetic ankle at push-off (1.13±0.22W/kg,
P<.001). There were no significant changes in temporal symmetry
or loading of the prosthetic limb, in the timed walking
test with each foot, or in the comfort score.</p>
<p>
Conclusions: A transfemoral amputee who wears an energystoring
foot can have a more symmetric gait with regard to
some measures of spatial symmetry, kinetics, and kinematics
than one who wears a conventional foot. However, in this study
important aspects such as more symmetric loading and comfort
did not differ significantly between the 2 foot types.</p>
More Information
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
Actions (login required)
View Item |