The luminance misattribution in lightness perception

SORANZO, Alessandro (2010). The luminance misattribution in lightness perception. Psihologija, 43 (1), 33-46.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2010/...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1001033S
Related URLs:

Abstract

The Simultaneous Lightness Contrast is the condition whereby a grey patch on a dark background appears lighter than a physically identical patch on a light background. This is probably the most studied phenomenon in lightness perception. Although this phenomenon has been explained in terms of low-level mechanisms, convincing evidences supporting a high-level interpretation have been presented over the last decades. Two are the main highlevel interpretations. On one side, the layer approach claims that the visual system splits the luminance into separate overlapping layers, corresponding to separate physical contributions; whilst on the other side, the framework approach maintains that the visual system groups the luminance within a set of contiguous frameworks. One of the biggest weaknesses of the layer approach is that it cannot account properly for errors in lightness perception (Gilchrist, 2005 Current Biology, 15(9), 330–332). To extend the multiple layers interpretation to errors in lightness perception, in this study we show that the perceptual lightness difference among equal patches on different backgrounds increases even when the luminance contrast with their backgrounds shrinks. Specifically, it is shown that the perceptual lightness difference among equal patches on different backgrounds intensifies when a small-sized semi-transparent surface is interposed between the patches and the backgrounds. This result indicates that in these conditions the visual system besides decomposing the luminance into separate layers also becomes liable for a luminance misattribution. It is proposed that the photometric and geometric relationships among the luminance edges in the image might account for this misattribution.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: From thematic issue: Cognitive Psychology
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Psychology Research Group
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1001033S
Page Range: 33-46
Depositing User: Alessandro Soranzo
Date Deposited: 25 Sep 2012 10:56
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 20:15
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6132

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics