THEOHARAKIS, V. and HIRST, A. (2002). Perceptual differences of marketing journals: a worldwide perspective. Marketing letters, 13 (4), 389-402.
The practice of evaluating faculty and business schools based on their journal publications has increased the emphasis on research output in peer reviewed journals. Since journal standings are a frequently debated issue, this study seeks to examine the perceptual differences of journals between different segments of marketing academics. Based on a worldwide online survey, journals are assessed in terms of four subjective quality metrics: journal familiarity, average rank position, percent of respondents who classify a journal as top tier, and readership. It is demonstrated that an individual's geographic origin, research interests or journal affiliation can have a significant impact on journal rankings.
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |