Current data processing methods and reporting standards for untargeted analysis of volatile organic compounds using direct mass spectrometry: a systematic review

ROSENTHAL, Kerry, LINDLEY, MR, TURNER, MA, RATCLIFFE, E and HUNSICKER, E (2024). Current data processing methods and reporting standards for untargeted analysis of volatile organic compounds using direct mass spectrometry: a systematic review. Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 20 (2), p. 42. [Article]

Documents
35314:891546
[thumbnail of Rosenthal-CurrentDataProcessing(VoR).pdf]
Preview
PDF
Rosenthal-CurrentDataProcessing(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview
Abstract

Introduction

Untargeted direct mass spectrometric analysis of volatile organic compounds has many potential applications across fields such as healthcare and food safety. However, robust data processing protocols must be employed to ensure that research is replicable and practical applications can be realised. User-friendly data processing and statistical tools are becoming increasingly available; however, the use of these tools have neither been analysed, nor are they necessarily suited for every data type.

Objectives

This review aims to analyse data processing and analytic workflows currently in use and examine whether methodological reporting is sufficient to enable replication.

Methods

Studies identified from Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically examined against the inclusion criteria. The experimental, data processing, and data analysis workflows were reviewed for the relevant studies.

Results

From 459 studies identified from the databases, a total of 110 met the inclusion criteria. Very few papers provided enough detail to allow all aspects of the methodology to be replicated accurately, with only three meeting previous guidelines for reporting experimental methods. A wide range of data processing methods were used, with only eight papers (7.3%) employing a largely similar workflow where direct comparability was achievable.

Conclusions

Standardised workflows and reporting systems need to be developed to ensure research in this area is replicable, comparable, and held to a high standard. Thus, allowing the wide-ranging potential applications to be realised.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item