Evaluation of the Perceived Benefits of a Peer Support Group for People with Mental Health Problems

BEARD, David, COTTAM, Charlie and PAINTER, Jon (2024). Evaluation of the Perceived Benefits of a Peer Support Group for People with Mental Health Problems. Nursing Reports, 14 (3), 1661-1675.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Painter-EvaluationPerceivedBenefits(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/14/3/124
Open Access URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/14/3/124/pdf?versio... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030124

Abstract

This paper reports on a service evaluation of PeerTalk, a nationwide charity that organises and facilitates peer support groups for individuals with depression. Therefore, the aim was to gather and synthesise benefits perceived by support group attendees. Thematic analysis was undertaken following the collection of data from two group interviews comprising PeerTalk support group attendees. Once those data were analysed, five key themes emerged: (1) talking/listening, (2) socialising, (3) contrast with other services, (4) personal benefits, and (5) structure and accessibility. Two further minor themes were also identified: (6) wider benefits and (7) areas for development that could lead to overall improvements to the service. PeerTalk’s support groups provide multiple opportunities for attendees to meet others who have similar experiences within an environment that does not require formal engagement or commitment. Those that attend find benefit from supporting others and socialising within the group. These benefits are complementary to mainstream services that they may concurrently be involved with, rather than replacing or hindering them. Peer support groups can therefore provide a resource for healthcare professionals to which they can direct individuals who may feel benefit from engaging with other individuals with similar experiences. Sheffield Hallam University granted ethics approval for the study (ER:59716880) prior to its commencement (16 February 2024).

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030124
Page Range: 1661-1675
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 25 Jul 2024 15:58
Last Modified: 25 Jul 2024 16:00
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/34000

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics