Musculoskeletal Health and Work: Development and Internal–External Cross-Validation of a Model to Predict Risk of Work Absence and Presenteeism in People Seeking Primary Healthcare

ARCHER, Lucinda, PEAT, George, SNELL, Kym IE, HILL, Jonathan C, DUNN, Kate M, FOSTER, Nadine E, BISHOP, Annette, VAN DER WINDT, Danielle and WYNNE-JONES, Gwenllian (2024). Musculoskeletal Health and Work: Development and Internal–External Cross-Validation of a Model to Predict Risk of Work Absence and Presenteeism in People Seeking Primary Healthcare. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

Preview

PDF Peat-MusculoskeletalHealthAndWork(VoR).pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose To develop and validate prediction models for the risk of future work absence and level of presenteeism, in adults seeking primary healthcare with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Methods Six studies from the West-Midlands/Northwest regions of England, recruiting adults consulting primary care with MSD were included for model development and internal–external cross-validation (IECV). The primary outcome was any work absence within 6 months of their consultation. Secondary outcomes included 6-month presenteeism and 12-month work absence. Ten candidate predictors were included: age; sex; multisite pain; baseline pain score; pain duration; job type; anxiety/depression; comorbidities; absence in the previous 6 months; and baseline presenteeism. Results For the 6-month absence model, 2179 participants (215 absences) were available across five studies. Calibration was promising, although varied across studies, with a pooled calibration slope of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.41–1.46) on IECV. On average, the model discriminated well between those with work absence within 6 months, and those without (IECV-pooled C-statistic 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.86). The 6-month presenteeism model, while well calibrated on average, showed some individual-level variation in predictive accuracy, and the 12-month absence model was poorly calibrated due to the small available size for model development. Conclusions The developed models predict 6-month work absence and presenteeism with reasonable accuracy, on average, in adults consulting with MSD. The model to predict 12-month absence was poorly calibrated and is not yet ready for use in practice. This information may support shared decision-making and targeting occupational health interventions at those with a higher risk of absence or presenteeism in the 6 months following consultation. Further external validation is needed before the models’ use can be recommended or their impact on patients can be fully assessed.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Musculoskeletal pain; Primary care; Prognosis; Prognostic model; Work absence; 1103 Clinical Sciences; Rehabilitation; 3505 Human resources and industrial relations; 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science
Identification Number:	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10223-w
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Elements
Depositing User:	Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited:	11 Jul 2024 10:33
Last Modified:	11 Jul 2024 10:45
URI:	https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33939

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads

Publication Metrics