Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world

Tools

REED, Mark S, MERKLE, Bethann Garramon, COOK, Elizabeth J, HAFFERTY, Caitlin, HEJNOWICZ, Adam P, HOLLIMAN, Richard, MARDER, Ian D, POOL, Ursula, RAYMOND, Christopher M, WALLEN, Kenneth E, WHYTE, David, BALLESTEROS, Marta, BHANBHRO, Sadiq, BOROTA, Siniša, BRENNAN, Marnie L, CARMEN, Esther, CONWAY, Elaine A, EVERETT, Rosie, ARMSTRONG-GIBBS, Fiona, JENSEN, Eric, KOREN, Gerbrand, LOCKETT, Jenny, OBANI, Pedi, O’CONNOR, Seb, PRANGE, Laurie, MASON, Jon, ROBINSON, Simon, SHUKLA, Priya, TARRANT, Anna, MARCHETTI, Alessandro and STROOBANT, Mascha (2024). Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world. Sustainability Science, 19, 1481-1490. [Article]

[+][-]

Documents

33647:644944

[+][-]

33647:644944

[thumbnail of Bhanbhro-ReimaginingTheLanguage( VoR ).pdf]

Preview

PDF
Bhanbhro-ReimaginingTheLanguage( VoR ).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (779kB) | Preview

Abstract

Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.

Plain Language Summary

What is it about?

Language influences how we see the world and act in it. The word ""stakeholder"" is common, but it might unintentionally support colonial ideas and unfair systems. This article looks at the problems with using ""stakeholder,"" such as its unclear meaning and its tendency to exclude certain groups. We highlight the need for words that give a voice to marginalized people, promote fairness, and encourage their genuine involvement in decision-making. By questioning the use of ""stakeholder"" and suggesting different approaches, we aim to help make research and society more fair and inclusive. Instead of proposing a single new term, we recommend focusing on the people, places, and animals impacted by decisions and projects.

Why is it important?

Our choice of words is essential. The words we use help create ideas and convey meaning, shaping how we understand and interact with the world. Language guides our thoughts and actions, influencing decision-making and how we see the world. Therefore, it is essential to consider inclusive language, which promotes diversity and inclusion instead of disadvantaging certain groups."

More Information

Official URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4

Open Access URL:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s116...

Open Access Version:

Published

Uncontrolled Keywords:

Environmental Sciences

Page Range:

1481-1490

Identifiers