Mundanity, fascination and threat: interrogating responses to publicly-engaged research in toilet, trans and disability studies amid a ‘culture war’

SLATER, Jen (2023). Mundanity, fascination and threat: interrogating responses to publicly-engaged research in toilet, trans and disability studies amid a ‘culture war’. The Sociological Review.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Slater-MundanityFascinationThreat(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (118kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0038...
Open Access URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0038... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231167747

Abstract

Toilets are political spaces: inadequate toilet access means limited access to wider space and community. Between 2015 and 2018 I led a series of interdisciplinary research projects collectively known as Around the Toilet (http://aroundthetoilet.com), which centred the experiences of trans, queer and disabled people to explore what makes a safe and accessible toilet space. The research sought to consolidate commitments to feminist, queer, trans and disability politics. In this article, I interrogate the repercussions of doing work at these political intersections by focusing not so much on the research findings themselves, but on the ways in which the project has been responded to within a context which is anti-expert, anti-‘woke’ and one of perceived scarcity. I reflect on my experiences as a trans person, leading a public-facing research project which centres trans lives, within a context of increasing trans hostility. I will show how Around the Toilet has at once been understood as too mundane (a waste of taxpayers’ money; a humorous thing to be researching); a fascination (a good journalistic ‘hook’; focus on particular aspects of the work, whilst ignoring others); and a threat to social order. I argue that – during a time where ‘impact’ is valued and academics are expected to be ‘public-facing’ – universities need to recognise harms that can come from this, and resource the labour that it takes to mitigate these harms (if the risk is deemed worth taking). I also outline ways in which universities and those with varying degrees of institutional power can help to make the academy a more sustainable place to work for those targeted in current culture wars.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1608 Sociology; Sociology; 44 Human society
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261231167747
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2023 17:21
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2023 15:31
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/31664

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics