Improving inclusivity in robotics design: an exploration of methods for upstream co-creation

DE SAILLE, Stevienna, KIPNIS, Eva, POTTER, Stephen, CAMERON, David, WEBB, Calum J. R., WINTER, Peter, O’NEILL, Peter, GOLD, Richard, HALLIWELL, Kate, ALBOUL, Lyuba, BELL, Andy J., STRATTON, Andrew and MCNAMARA, Jon (2022). Improving inclusivity in robotics design: an exploration of methods for upstream co-creation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9.

[img]
Preview
PDF
frobt-09-731006.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt...
Open Access URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.731006

Abstract

Disabled people are often involved in robotics research as potential users of technologies which address specific needs. However, their more generalised lived expertise is not usually included when planning the overall design trajectory of robots for health and social care purposes. This risks losing valuable insight into the lived experience of disabled people, and impinges on their right to be involved in the shaping of their future care. This project draws upon the expertise of an interdisciplinary team to explore methodologies for involving people with disabilities in the early design of care robots in a way that enables incorporation of their broader values, experiences and expectations. We developed a comparative set of focus group workshops using Community Philosophy, LEGO® Serious Play® and Design Thinking to explore how people with a range of different physical impairments used these techniques to envision a “useful robot”. The outputs were then workshopped with a group of roboticists and designers to explore how they interacted with the thematic map produced. Through this process, we aimed to understand how people living with disability think robots might improve their lives and consider new ways of bringing the fullness of lived experience into earlier stages of robot design. Secondary aims were to assess whether and how co-creative methodologies might produce actionable information for designers (or why not), and to deepen the exchange of social scientific and technical knowledge about feasible trajectories for robotics in health-social care. Our analysis indicated that using these methods in a sequential process of workshops with disabled people and incorporating engineers and other stakeholders at the Design Thinking stage could potentially produce technologically actionable results to inform follow-on proposals.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ** From Frontiers via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ **Journal IDs: eissn 2296-9144 **Article IDs: publisher-id: 731006 **History: published_online 21-06-2022; accepted 14-04-2022; collection 2022; submitted 25-06-2021
Uncontrolled Keywords: Robotics and AI, social aspects of robotics, co-creation and co-production, social robots, disabled people, care robot acceptance, user—centered design, design thinking, lego serious play
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.731006
SWORD Depositor: Colin Knott
Depositing User: Colin Knott
Date Deposited: 12 Jul 2022 10:57
Last Modified: 12 Oct 2023 11:15
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/30444

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics