Online hate and sport: an overview of the key literature

KEARNS, Colm, SINCLAIR, Gary, BLACK, Jack, DOIDGE, Mark, FLETCHER, Thomas, KILVINGTON, Daniel, LISTON, Katie, LYNN, Theodore and ROSATI, Pierangelo (2022). Online hate and sport: an overview of the key literature. In: The European Association for Sociology of Sport and the International Sociology of Sport Association World Congress of Sociology of Sport, Tübingen, Germany, 07-10 Jun 2022. [Conference or Workshop Item]

Documents
30388:605665
[thumbnail of Black (2022) Conference Abstract.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Black (2022) Conference Abstract.pdf - Published Version
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (59kB) | Preview
Abstract
Significant flashpoints such as the racist abuse English football players were subject to during Euro 2020 and the culture wars that have ignited over Colin Kapernick’s taking of the knee protest against systemic racism in America, have brought increased attention to the topic of online hate in sport. However, this is not a recent phenomenon. It has been a growing concern for a variety of stakeholders in sport who have been subject to or impacted by racist, sexist, misogynistic, sectarian, homophobic and transphobic hate speech via social media platforms. Furthermore, hate speech has been a consistent problem in sport, particularly football, long before online spaces became such a key aspect of the discourse. Social media has just illuminated the scale and depth of the overall problem. Accordingly, sporting governing bodies, anti-hate organisations and policy makers have been left playing catch-up with a problem that continues to increase in scope and complexity. In this paper we share a scoping review of the complete history (which begins in 2005) of literature that has been written on this subject. Specifically, we document how online hate in this space has evolved as social media technology has transformed, the dominant theoretical and methodological frameworks that have emerged, the perpetrators, targets and subtypes of hate that contextualise the research undertaken. We identify gaps within the review and potential questions, contexts and methods that should receive attention in future research.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item