FAUSET, Daniel (2020). The reforms to care proceedings – one step forward and two steps back? A critical evaluation of the new legal framework and its impact on the pre-proceedings stage. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 32 (1). [Article]
Documents
25790:542874
PDF
Fauset-ReformsToCareProceedings(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Fauset-ReformsToCareProceedings(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (331kB) | Preview
Abstract
The family justice system in England and Wales has undergone a process of considerable reform
in recent years, particularly in the area of care proceedings. Following the Family Justice
Review the government introduced strict time limits to the duration of proceedings and also
made changes to other elements such as limiting the use of experts, revising the Public Law
Outline and developing statutory guidance for work undertaken prior to proceedings. The
implementation of these changes has had mixed results. But what specific impact have the
reforms had on the period prior to proceedings and how has this affected the main parties
involved, namely local authorities, parents and children? In the last few years a range of studies
have been undertaken to assess this impact involving government departments, academics,
practitioners and families, including the Care Crisis Review. Drawing principally on this
academic research along with other evidence, this article critically evaluates the impact of the
reforms of the pre-proceedings landscape to determine their effectiveness. Ultimately, whilst the
reforms are to be welcomed in some areas and provide certainty in process, they also risk
shifting the focus away from working with families and avoiding court, to one of evidence
gathering and ensuring that care applications are robust once proceedings are issued.
More Information
Statistics
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Share
Actions (login required)
View Item |