MALLINSON, Lucy, RUSSELL, Jean, CAMERON, Duncan D., TON, Jurriaan, HORTON, Peter and BARKER, Margo E. (2018). Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate. Food Security, 10 (5), 1145-1161.
|
PDF
Mallinson2018_Article_WhyRationalArgumentFailsTheGen.pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
AbstractGenetic modification (GM) of crops provides a methodology for the agricultural improvements needed to deliver global food security. However, public opposition to GM-food is great. The debate has tended to risk communication, but here we show through study of a large nationally representative sample of British adults that public acceptance of GM-food has social, cultural and affective contexts. Regression models showed that metaphysical beliefs about the sanctity of food and an emotional dislike of GM-food were primary negative determinants, while belief in the value of science and favourable evaluation of the benefits-to-risks of GM-food were secondary positive determinants. Although institutional trust, general knowledge of the GM-food debate and belief in the eco-friendliness of GM-food were all associated with acceptance, their influence was minor. While a belief in the sanctity of food had a direct inverse effect on GM acceptance, belief in the value of science was largely mediated through favourable perception of benefits-to-risks. Furthermore, segmentation analysis demonstrated that anxiety about GM-food had social and cultural antecedents, with white men being least anxious and older vegetarian women being most anxious. Rational argument alone about the risks and benefits of GM-food is unlikely to change public perceptions of GM-technology.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | ** From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router **Journal IDs: pissn 1876-4517; eissn 1876-4525 **Article IDs: publisher-id: s12571-018-0832-1; manuscript: 832 **History: received 03-01-2018; submitted 03-01-2018; accepted 14-08-2018; ppub 10-2018; epub 01-10-2018 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Original Paper, Genetic modification debate, Attitudinal survey, Rationality, Affect, Food |
Departments - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: | Sheffield Business School > Department of Service Sector Management |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0832-1 |
Page Range: | 1145-1161 |
SWORD Depositor: | Margaret Boot |
Depositing User: | Margaret Boot |
Date Deposited: | 31 Oct 2018 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 17 Mar 2021 20:30 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23081 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year