ALLMARK, P. J. (1996). Reply to Ann Bradshaw. Journal of medical ethics, 22 (1), 13-15.
Full text not available from this repository.
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.1.13
Abstract
My original paper suggested that an ethics of care which failed to specify how, and about what, to care would be devoid of normative and descriptive content. Bradshaw's approach provides such a specification and is, therefore, not devoid of such content. However, as all ethical approaches suggest something about the 'what' and 'how' of care, they are all 'ethics of care' in this broader sense. This reinforces rather than undermines my original conclusion. Furthermore, Bradshaw's 'ethics of care' has philosophical and historical problems which I outline.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: | Centre for Health and Social Care Research |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.1.13 |
Page Range: | 13-15 |
Depositing User: | Caroline Fixter |
Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2010 15:57 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 09:15 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1745 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year