The recovery movement and its implications for policy, commissioning and practice

BEST, David, DE ALWIS, Stephanie Judith and BURDETT, Donna (2017). The recovery movement and its implications for policy, commissioning and practice. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 34 (2), 107-111.

Preview

PDF Best-Recovery movement and its implications for policy(VoR).pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (159kB) | Preview

Abstract

While a recovery approach is widespread and relatively unquestioned in the USA, its implementation in the UK and to a lesser extent in Australia has provoked a number of questions about what this means in practice and what some of the implications are for treatment. This is particularly important as there is growing interest in recovery in Western Europe with policy recognition in Belgium and the Netherlands, and increased interest in research issues around recovery. What this article sets out to do is to discuss the implications of a recovery model for commissioning and treatment systems, with a focus on where recovery approaches sit and what they can offer in terms of added value to treatment approaches.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	** From Crossref via Jisc Publications Router.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Health Policy, Health(social science)
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018:	Law Research Group
Identification Number:	https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072517691058
Page Range:	107-111
SWORD Depositor:	Jill Hazard
Depositing User:	Jill Hazard
Date Deposited:	27 Sep 2017 09:46
Last Modified:	18 Mar 2021 16:08
URI:	https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/16868

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads

Publication Metrics