Claimant illegality as a defence to negligence: Gray v Thames Trains and others

Tools

WILLIAMS, K. (2009). Claimant illegality as a defence to negligence: Gray v Thames Trains and others. Journal of professional negligence (2), 150-153. [Article]

Documents
1003:384
[thumbnail of Word to PDF conversion (via antiword) conversion from application/msword to application/pdf]
Preview
PDF (Word to PDF conversion (via antiword) conversion from application/msword to application/pdf)
Illegality_as_a_Defence_to_Negligence.pdf

Download (22kB)
More Information
Additional Information:
Copyright: Bloomsbury Publishing
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Negligence – personal injury damages – loss of earnings – post-traumatic stress disorder; ex turpi causa; public policy; causation
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018:
Law Research Group
Page Range:
150-153

Identifiers

Library

Item Type:
Article
Depositing User:
Ann Betterton
Date Deposited:
02 Feb 2010 12:10
Last Modified:
19 Dec 2024 01:12
URI:
https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1003
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

SHURA supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://shura.shu.ac.uk/cgi/oai2