Ordering of Oblate Hard Particles between Hybrid Penetrable Walls.

ANQUETIL-DECK, Candy, CLEAVER, Douglas J. and TEIXEIRA, Paulo I.C. (2020). Ordering of Oblate Hard Particles between Hybrid Penetrable Walls. J Phys Chem B.

Cleaver_OrderingOblateHard(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (4MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05027
Open Access URL: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05027
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05027


We report a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation study of a model discotic liquid crystal (DLC) confined between hybrid walls with controllable penetrability. The model consists of oblate hard Gaussian overlap (HGO) particles. Particle-substrate interactions are modeled as follows: each substrate sees a particle as a disc of zero thickness and diameter D less than or equal to that of the actual particle, σ0, embedded inside the particle and located halfway along, and perpendicular to, its minor axis. This allows us to control the anchoring properties of the substrates, from planar (edge-on) for D ≈ 0 to homeotropic (face-on) for D ≈ σ0, which can be done independently at either substrate. Depending on the values of Ds ≡ D/σ0 at the top (D s t ) and bottom (D s b ) substrates, we find domains in (D s b , D s t ) space in which particle alignment is uniform planar (UP), is uniform homeotropic (UH), or varies linearly from planar at one substrate to homeotropic at the other (Lin). These domains are separated by regions of bistability (P-Lin and H-Lin), which appear to be wider than for prolate HGOs, and there may be also a small tristable (P-H-Lin) region. Results are compared with the predictions of density functional theory, implemented at the level of Onsager's second-virial approximation with Parsons-Lee rescaling. As in the case of symmetric confinement studied previously, the agreement between theory and simulation is substantially less good than for prolate HGOs: in particular, for the investigated substrate separation L = 6σ0, the Lin configuration is never predicted. These discrepancies are likely a consequence of the fact that Onsager's theory is less accurate for discs than for rods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 02 Physical Sciences; 03 Chemical Sciences; 09 Engineering
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05027
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 10 Sep 2020 15:21
Last Modified: 17 Mar 2021 23:00
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27190

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics