Achieving "transparency, consistency and fairness" in English higher education admissions: progress since Schwartz?

ADNETT, N., MCCAIG, C., SLACK, K. and BOWERS-BROWN, Tamsin (2010). Achieving "transparency, consistency and fairness" in English higher education admissions: progress since Schwartz? Higher education quarterly, 65 (1), 12-33. [Article]

Documents
2383:546
[thumbnail of Schwartz_Paper_Nick_Adnett_Colin_McCaig_2010.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Schwartz_Paper_Nick_Adnett_Colin_McCaig_2010.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License All rights reserved.

Download (138kB)
Abstract
In 2004 the Schwartz Review advised English HEIs that their admissions systems should: be transparent; select students who are able to complete their courses based upon achievements and potential; use assessment methods which are reliable and valid; minimise barriers to applicants; be professional, and be underpinned by appropriate institutional structures and processes. These five principles were only expressed as recommendations, reflecting the reluctance of policymakers to interfere with individual HEIs’ admissions policies. In this paper we analyse the results of a research project which reviewed the progress which English HEIs had made in implementing the Schwartz recommendations and assess whether a more interventionist stance is required to achieve ‘fair admissions’.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item