Reply to Ann Bradshaw

ALLMARK, P. J. (1996). Reply to Ann Bradshaw. Journal of medical ethics, 22 (1), 13-15.

Full text not available from this repository.
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.1.13
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    My original paper suggested that an ethics of care which failed to specify how, and about what, to care would be devoid of normative and descriptive content. Bradshaw's approach provides such a specification and is, therefore, not devoid of such content. However, as all ethical approaches suggest something about the 'what' and 'how' of care, they are all 'ethics of care' in this broader sense. This reinforces rather than undermines my original conclusion. Furthermore, Bradshaw's 'ethics of care' has philosophical and historical problems which I outline.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.1.13
    Page Range: 13-15
    Depositing User: Caroline Fixter
    Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2010 15:57
    Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 09:15
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1745

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics