Reply to Ann Bradshaw

ALLMARK, P. J. (1996). Reply to Ann Bradshaw. Journal of medical ethics, 22 (1), 13-15.

Full text not available from this repository.
Link to published version:: 10.1136/jme.22.1.13

Abstract

My original paper suggested that an ethics of care which failed to specify how, and about what, to care would be devoid of normative and descriptive content. Bradshaw's approach provides such a specification and is, therefore, not devoid of such content. However, as all ethical approaches suggest something about the 'what' and 'how' of care, they are all 'ethics of care' in this broader sense. This reinforces rather than undermines my original conclusion. Furthermore, Bradshaw's 'ethics of care' has philosophical and historical problems which I outline.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
Identification Number: 10.1136/jme.22.1.13
Depositing User: Caroline Fixter
Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2010 16:57
Last Modified: 29 Apr 2010 16:57
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1745

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics