QuantCrit: education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics

GILBOURN, David, WARMINGTON, Paul and DEMACK, Sean (2017). QuantCrit: education, policy, ‘Big Data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race, Ethnicity and Education.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Demack-QuantCrit(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
All rights reserved.

Download (269kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Demack-QuantCrit(Fig1and2).pdf - Supplemental Material
All rights reserved.

Download (95kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Demack-QuantCrit(Table1).pdf - Supplemental Material
All rights reserved.

Download (111kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1361332...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Quantitative research enjoys heightened esteem among policy-makers, media and the general public. Whereas qualitative research is frequently dismissed as subjective and impressionistic, statistics are often assumed to be objective and factual. We argue that these distinctions are wholly false; quantitative data is no less socially constructed than any other form of research material. The first part of the paper presents a conceptual critique of the field with empirical examples that expose and challenge hidden assumptions that frequently encode racist perspectives beneath the façade of supposed quantitative objectivity. The second part of the paper draws on the tenets of Critical Race Theory (CRT) to set out some principles to guide the future use and analysis of quantitative data. These ‘QuantCrit’ ideas concern (1) the centrality of racism as a complex and deeply-rooted aspect of society that is not readily amenable to quantification; (2) numbers are not neutral and should be interrogated for their role in promoting deficit analyses that serve White racial interests; (3) categories are neither ‘natural’ nor given and so the units and forms of analysis must be critically evaluated; (4) voice and insight are vital: data cannot ‘speak for itself’ and critical analyses should be informed by the experiential knowledge of marginalized groups; (5) statistical analyses have no inherent value but can play a role in struggles for social justice.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Sheffield Institute of Education
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
    Depositing User: Jill Hazard
    Date Deposited: 06 Sep 2017 15:20
    Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 06:20
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/16657

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics