Comparisons between CRM and CCM PFC

ZHANG, Weiping, ZHANG, Wei, YANG, Jianbo and AL-NAEMI, Faris (2013). Comparisons between CRM and CCM PFC. Energy and Power Engineering, 5 (4B), 864-868.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Al-Naemi - Yang et al - Comparisons between CRM and CCM PFC (VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (702kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.54B165
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    The paper presents detailed comparisons between CRM (critical conduction mode) and CCM (continuous conduction mode) control schemes used for Boost PFC converter. The two schemes are analyzed and compared under the chips of L6561 and UC 3854 which are commonly used for CRM and CCM respectively. Both schemes are based on multiplier; however, the CCM is more complex and needs more periphery components which increase the cost. The Boost PFC under CRM is easier to be implemented. Nevertheless, the variable switch frequency makes the system (including the power-stage inductor and capacitor) hard to design. It seems that the CRM PFC is more attractive in low power applications which only need to meet IEC61000-3-2 D standard. Some experiment results are also presented for the comparison.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: CRM; CCM; PFC; Boost
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Materials and Engineering Research Institute > Centre for Automation and Robotics Research > Mobile Machine and Vision Laboratory
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.54B165
    Page Range: 864-868
    Depositing User: Jill Hazard
    Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2016 09:58
    Last Modified: 08 Jul 2019 18:15
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/14289

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics