Why US nationalism should never be considered postnationalist

MADRIAGA, M. (2010). Why US nationalism should never be considered postnationalist. National identities, 12 (1), 81-94.

Full text not available from this repository.
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940903542672
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    This article demonstrates that American national identity is symbolic, subjective and ambiguous to the extent that it encapsulates senses of both similarity and difference. Citing evidence from life-history interviews with American military veterans from different ethnic groups, the article shows how some Americans can identify with being racially excluded and still share in a sense of national belonging. It is argued here that this feature is and has always been embedded in the processes of American national identification. In making this argument, this article rejects Ramsey Cook's notion that achieving a sense of similarity between universal and particular interests within a national community is hallmark of postnationalism.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: American nationalism, ethnicity, nationalism, postnationalism, whiteness
    Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Learning Enhancement and Academic Development
    Sociology, Politics and Policy Research Group
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1080/14608940903542672
    Page Range: 81-94
    Depositing User: Caroline Fixter
    Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2010 16:28
    Last Modified: 10 Oct 2018 13:16
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/1316

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics