CRISP, Richard, GORE, Tony and PEARSON, Sarah (2015). Rethinking the impact of regeneration on poverty: a (partial) defence of a 'failed' policy. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 23 (3), 167-187.
|
PDF
Crisp - Poverty and regen article 25 09 15 with abstract and NO tracked changes.pdf - Accepted Version All rights reserved. Download (478kB) | Preview |
|
PDF (Acceptance e-mail)
Crisp - 11323.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (101kB) |
Abstract
For decades regeneration programmes in England targeted areas where spatial concentrations of poverty exist. These 'area-based initiatives' (ABIs) came under sustained attack, however, from the previous coalition government for being expensive and ineffective. This paper assesses this claim by re-evaluating past evidence on the impact of regeneration on poverty. It finds regeneration did relatively little to transform households' material circumstances but significantly ameliorated negative experiences of living in poverty in relation to housing, community safety and the physical environment. This partially undermines the rationale for the policy shift away from neighbourhood renewal interventions toward the current focus on 'local growth' as the sole remedy for spatial inequalities. It also suggests a need for more nuance in wider critical accounts of regeneration as a deepening form of neoliberalism.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: | Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1332/175982715X14443317211905 |
Page Range: | 167-187 |
Depositing User: | Louise South |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2016 16:14 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 06:18 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11323 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year