MORRISON, Andrew (2024). Graduate income inequalities: a qualified desert responsibility analysis. Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education, 5 (2), 357-381.
|
PDF
Morrison-GraduateIncomeInequalities(VoR).pdf - Published Version Creative Commons Attribution. Download (186kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article proposes a ‘qualified desert responsibility’ framework to analyse social class-based differentials in graduate incomes in the UK. I posit that unequal outcomes can only be justified on desert grounds by virtue of actions or qualities for which individuals may reasonably be held responsible. I then review a range of sociological studies of graduate employment from which I conclude that disparities between middle-class and working-class graduates cannot be justified by reference to a desert principle because they are the product of an unequally structured labour market for which individuals cannot reasonably be held responsible. In the discussion, I develop this argument by drawing upon Fishkin’s theory of ‘opportunity pluralism’. I conclude with a brief account of sociological investigations of intra-class graduate employment experiences. Here, I suggest that unequal outcomes can be justified by reference to the desert principle where there is evidence that the responsibility condition has been met.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This paper has been checked for publication on a weekly basis and was first identified as being published on 11/03/2024 |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.3726/PTIHE.022023.0357 |
Page Range: | 357-381 |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic Elements |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Elements |
Date Deposited: | 24 Apr 2023 14:43 |
Last Modified: | 27 Mar 2024 14:48 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/31797 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year