The disgusting self: developing and validating an implicit measure of self-disgust

ROBSON, Anna Catherine (2022). The disgusting self: developing and validating an implicit measure of self-disgust. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. [Thesis]

Documents
31703:615742
[thumbnail of Edited for copyright reasons]
Preview
PDF (Edited for copyright reasons)
Robson_2022_PhD_DisgustingSelfDeveloping(edited).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (17MB) | Preview
31703:616008
[thumbnail of VoR not available]
PDF (VoR not available)
arobson_2022_PhD_TheDisgustingSelf.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (32MB)
Abstract
Self-disgust is a negative self-conscious emotion schema (Powell et al., 2015) that originates from the basic emotion of disgust but is directed to the self. Self-disgust can be directed towards the self, commonly referred to as self-disgust “self” (e.g., "I find myself repulsive") or to one’s actions, referred to as self-disgust “ways” (e.g., "I often do things I find revolting") (Overton et al., 2008). The concept of self-disgust as an emotion schema highlights the fact that it is a lasting cognitive-affective construct, that requires some level of self-awareness (Powell et al., 2015). There are two main measures for self-disgust, which are both self-report questionnaires; the Self-Disgust Scale (SDS; Overton et al., 2008) and the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Self-Disgust (QASD; Schienle et al., 2014). Although self-report measures can offer insight into the experience of self-disgust, there are several limitations to their use. The aim of the present PhD thesis was to develop and validate a new implicit association test (IAT) to measure self-disgust. To do so, a systematic literature review (Chapter 2) was conducted to understand the relationship between self-disgust and mental health difficulties in clinical and non-clinical populations. The development of the implicit self-disgust measure involved four studies. Study 1 (word validation study) used a sample of university students to validate a set of disgust-related words and happy words, matched for length. This process resulted in 27 word-pairs (disgust-happy) that were used subsequently in the development of the IAT. In Study 2, the newly developed IAT was validated in a sample of adults, which included two target categories (self and other) alongside two attribute categories (disgust and happy). Study 3 involved development and validation of a single-target IAT (removing the “other” target category) in a sample of healthy adults. Finally, Study 4, used the single-target IAT, in a population with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or trauma-related experiences, which is known to exhibit high levels of self-disgust. Overall, the findings from the four studies, suggest that self-disgust may not reflect automatic, implicit cognitive processes, as measured by IATs. Rather, self-disgust requires reflective processes that are more readily captured using self-report measures. An extensive discussion on the utility of IAT in the context of self-disgust and the limitations of the current thesis are presented in the last chapter.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item