The distinctiveness of smaller voluntary organisations providing welfare services

DAYSON, Christopher, BENNETT, Ellen, DAMM, Christopher, REES, James, JACKLIN-JARVIS, Carol, PATMORE, Beth, BAKER, Leila, TERRY, Vita and TURNER, Katie (2022). The distinctiveness of smaller voluntary organisations providing welfare services. Journal of Social Policy.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Dayson-DistinctivenessSmallerVoluntary(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (209kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of...
Open Access URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambri... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000970

Abstract

This article presents empirical findings about the distinctiveness of smaller voluntary sector organisations (VSOs) involved in welfare service provision, based on in-depth, qualitative case study research. We identify a series of organisational features and practices which can mean that smaller VSOs are distinctive from larger organisations. These include how they are governed and managed, their approach to their work, and their position relative to other providers. To explain our findings, we draw on the concept of stakeholder ambiguity. This idea was posited by Billis and Glennerster (1998) and is commonly cited in relation to distinctiveness. We identified several manifestations of stakeholder ambiguity and confirm the concept’s explanatory importance, although we argue that our understanding of distinctiveness is enhanced when stakeholder ambiguity is considered alongside other closely related features, such as being embedded in a local geographic community and informal familial care-based organisational cultures. Our findings also highlight the fragility of smaller VSOs. We argue that this combination of distinctiveness and fragility creates a tension for social policy makers, many of whom recognise the value of smaller VSOs and the risks that they face but must weigh this against a requirement to allocate resources for statutory services as effectively as possible.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 1605 Policy and Administration; 1607 Social Work; 2203 Philosophy; Political Science & Public Administration
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000970
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2021 15:03
Last Modified: 24 Feb 2022 10:15
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29360

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics