BALSHAW, Thomas G, MADEN-WILKINSON, Tom, MASSEY, Garry J and FOLLAND, Jonathan P (2021). The Human Muscle Size and Strength Relationship. Effects of Architecture, Muscle Force and Measurement Location. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. [Article]
Documents
28606:587103
PDF
Maden-Wilkinson-HumanMuscleSize(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Maden-Wilkinson-HumanMuscleSize(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (975kB) | Preview
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to determine the best muscle size index of muscle strength by establishing if incorporating muscle architecture measurements improved the human muscle size-strength relationship. The influence of calculating muscle force, and the location of anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) measurements on this relationship were also examined.
Methods
Fifty-two recreationally active males completed unilateral isometric knee extension strength assessments and MRI scans of the dominant thigh and knee to determine quadriceps femoris (QF) size variables (ACSA along the length of the femur, maximum ACSA [ACSAMAX] and volume [VOL]) and patellar tendon moment arm. Ultrasound images (2 sites per constituent muscle) were analyzed to quantify muscle architecture (fascicle length, pennation angle), and when combined with VOL (from MRI), facilitated calculation of QF effective PCSA (EFFPCSA) as potentially the best muscle size determinant of strength. Muscle force was calculated by dividing maximum voluntary torque (MVT) by the moment arm and addition of antagonist torque (derived from hamstring EMG).
Results
The associations of EFFPCSA (r=0.685), ACSAMAX (r=0.697), or VOL (r=0.773) with strength did not differ, although qualitatively VOL explained 59.8% of the variance in strength, ~11-13% greater than EFFPCSA or ACSAMAX. All muscle size variables had weaker associations with muscle force than MVT. The association of strength-ACSA at 65% of femur length (r=0.719) was greater than for ACSA measured between 10-55% and 75-90% (r=-0.042-0.633) of femur length.
Conclusions
In conclusion, using contemporary methods to assess muscle architecture and calculate EFFPCSA did not enhance the muscle strength-size association. For understanding/monitoring muscle size, the major determinant of strength, these findings support the assessment of muscle volume, that is independent of architecture measurements, and was most highly correlated to strength.
More Information
Statistics
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
Actions (login required)
View Item |