REDMAN, Jamie (2020). From welfare to warfare: class struggle on the margins. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. [Thesis]
Documents
28130:567667
PDF
Redman_2020_PhD_FromWelfareWarfare.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 November 2024.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Redman_2020_PhD_FromWelfareWarfare.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 November 2024.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (4MB)
Abstract
Since the mid-1980s, UK welfare reform has seen policymakers incrementally re-design
the framing, structure and delivery of the UK’s social security system. Britain’s network
of benefit administration and employment service offices have experienced a range of
expenditure cuts and are increasingly governed by a new ‘workfarist’ mesh of
behavioural conditionality and labour market activation policy. The overarching purpose
of this, or at least according to a number of key politicians, has been to ensure labour
market discipline among the UK’s out-of-work claiming population by transforming the
social security system into a device for altering behaviour.
In recent decades, a number of critical interpretations of welfare reform have emerged;
two of which have been dominant above all others. One interpretation—heavily
influenced by Marxist regulation theory—suggests that welfare reform has emerged as
a logical social policy compliment to wider processes of labour market restructuring and
a rise in low-paying, contingent ‘jobs that nobody wants’. This interpretation suggests
that the services tasked with delivering welfare reform are experienced as sites of
discipline and deterrence; ensuring that out-of-work claimants engage with unattractive
jobs. A second interpretation—evolving partially out of regulation theory but
significantly developed and heavily influenced by Wacquant—suggests that welfare
reform has emerged as one part of a dual regulatory response to manage a surge in
social unrest and urban marginality. This interpretation suggests that the services tasked
with delivering welfare reform are experienced as sites of criminalisation and suffering
in order to correct behavioural dysfunction and bend out-of-work claimants towards
dependency on low-wage, precarious work.
The present thesis offers an alternative interpretation. It is suggested here that UK
welfare reform has emerged in response to an accumulation of working class struggles.
Drawing on longitudinal interviews with 15 young male claimants and 11 interviews with
frontline benefit administration/employment service workers, it is also suggested here
that the services tasked with delivering welfare reform are experienced as sites of class
struggle. On one side of the desk, frontline workers operate in pressured conditions to
probe for claimant resistance, ensure work-related compliance and, in some instances,
antagonise claimants in efforts to secure their resignation from benefit receipt. Whilst,
on the other side of the desk, claimants use a range of methods to struggle against and
subvert frontline service delivery in favour of prioritising their own individual needs and
interests.
More Information
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
Actions (login required)
View Item |