Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise

KOYA, Kushwanth and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda (2017). Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise. PLOS ONE, 12 (12), e0190337. [Article]

Documents
23542:521779
[thumbnail of Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (328kB) | Preview
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722.
More Information
Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item