Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise

Tools

KOYA, Kushwanth and CHOWDHURY, Gobinda (2017). Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise. PLOS ONE, 12 (12), e0190337.

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Correction: Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (328kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.13...
Open Access URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=... (Published)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179722.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: MD Multidisciplinary; General Science & Technology
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190337
Page Range: e0190337
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2019 10:32
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 06:33
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/23542

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics