Speech and language therapists’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance construction and maintenance in aphasia rehabilitation post stroke

LAWTON, Michelle, SAGE, Karen, HADDOCK, Gillian, CONROY, Paul and SERRANT, Laura (2018). Speech and language therapists’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance construction and maintenance in aphasia rehabilitation post stroke. International journal of language and communication disorders, 53 (3), 550-563.

Sage-SpeechAndLanguageTherapistsPerspectivesOfTherapeuticAlliance(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (170kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-69...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12368


Background: Therapeutic alliance refers to the interactional and relational processes operating during therapeutic interventions. It been shown to be a strong determinant of treatment efficacy in psychotherapy and evidence is emerging from a range of healthcare and medical disciplines to suggest that the construct of therapeutic alliance may in fact be a variable component of treatment outcome, engagement and satisfaction. Although this construct appears to be highly relevant to aphasia rehabilitation, no research to date has attempted to explore this phenomenon and thus consider its potential utility as a mechanism for change. Aims: This novel study aims to explore speech and language therapists’ perceptions and experiences of developing and maintaining therapeutic alliances in aphasia rehabilitation post stroke. Methods & Procedures: Twenty two, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with speech and language therapists working with people with aphasia post stroke. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Outcomes & Results: Analysis resulted in the emergence of three overarching themes: 1) laying the groundwork; 2) augmenting cohesion; and, 3) contextual shapers. Recognising personhood, developing shared expectations of therapy and establishing therapeutic ownership were central to laying the groundwork for therapeutic delivery. Augmenting cohesion was perceived to be dependent on the therapists’ responsiveness and ability to resolve both conflict and resistance, as part of an ongoing active process. These processes were further moulded by contextual shapers such as the patient’s family, relational continuity and organisational drivers. Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that therapists used multiple, complex relational strategies to establish and manage alliances with people with aphasia, which were reliant on a fluid interplay of verbal and non-verbal skills. The data highlight the need for further training to support therapists to forge purposive alliances. Training should develop: therapeutic reflexivity; inclusivity in goal setting, relational strategies and motivational enhancement techniques. The conceptualisation of therapeutic alliance, however, is only provisional. Further research is essential to elucidate the experiences and perceptions of alliance development for people with aphasia undergoing rehabilitation.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12368
Page Range: 550-563
Depositing User: Jill Hazard
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2017 15:01
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 12:16
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17415

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics