Building realist programme theory for large complex and messy interventions

SHEARN, Katie, ALLMARK, Peter, PIERCY, Hilary and HIRST, Julia (2017). Building realist programme theory for large complex and messy interventions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 1-11.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Shearn Building realist programme theory for large complex and messy interventions_final.pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (593kB) | Preview
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917741796

Abstract

Programme theory, that is, the specific idea about how a programme causes the intended or observed outcomes, should be the central aspect of any realist evaluation or synthesis. The methods used for explicating or building initial rough programme theories in realist research are varied and arguably often underreported. In addition, pre-existing psychological and sociological theories, at a higher level of abstraction, could be used to a greater extent to inform their development. This article illustrates a method for building initial rough programme theories for use in realist research evaluation and synthesis. This illustration involves showing how the initial rough programme theories were developed in a realist evaluation concerning sexual health services for young people. In this evaluation, a broad framework of abstract theories was constructed early in the process to support initial rough programme theory building and frame more specific programme theories as they were developed. These abstract theories were selected to support theorising at macro, meso and micro levels of social structure. The paper discusses the benefits of using this method to build initial theories for particular types of interventions which are large, complex and messy. It also addresses challenges relating to the selection of suitable theories.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Centre for Health and Social Care Research
Departments - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities > Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917741796
Page Range: 1-11
Depositing User: Hilary Ridgway
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2017 14:28
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 07:03
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17295

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics