Reading between blurred lines: the complexity of interpretation

HANDFORTH, Rachel, PATERSON, Laura, L., COFFEY-GLOVER, Laura and MILLS, Sara (2017). Reading between blurred lines: the complexity of interpretation. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 103-115.

Handforth-ReadingBetweenTheBlurredLines(AM-Q).pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (278kB) | Preview
Official URL:
Link to published version::


This article uses thematic qualitative analysis and techniques from corpus linguistics to interrogate the way that listeners interpret and make sense of Blurred Lines. The song was controversial upon its release as many listeners felt that it implied that even if women said they did not want sex, in fact, they did. Such issues of sexual consent are a key issue for feminist analysis, particularly within current debates about ‘rape culture’. We investigated listeners’ interpretations of the song, distributing an online questionnaire to over 1000 respondents. We found that most listeners either interpreted the song as relating to sexual consent and took offence, or felt that it was simply representative of the genre, and found the song unproblematic. However, a number of listeners expressed conflict in relation to the song, enjoying it musically but finding the lyrics particularly problematic. Our analysis investigates the language that respondents used to negotiate their relationships with the different elements of the song.

Item Type: Article
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: Humanities Research Centre
Identification Number:
Page Range: 103-115
Depositing User: Rachel Handforth
Date Deposited: 18 Oct 2017 11:26
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 01:09

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics