DEXTER, Matt (2014). Open design and medical products. Doctoral, Sheffield Hallam University. [Thesis]
Documents
12190:38260
PDF
M_Dexter_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
M_Dexter_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.
Download (8MB) | Preview
Abstract
This research details the use of Open Design to enable participation in the conceptualisation, design and
development of medical products for those who are excluded by their chronic health condition.
The research was directed according to the Action Research methodology outlined by Checkland & Holwell
(1998); Action Research being highlighted by Archer (1995) as a method compatible for practice-led design
research.
Open design directed the design practice, which consisted of a long case study spanning 18 months from
February 2012, through to July 2013. This case study, dubbed AIR involved the creation of a bespoke online
social network, recruitment of people living with cystic fibrosis, and the facilitation of collaborative design work
resulting in prototype medical devices based on the lived experience of the participants.
The work involves research into design within health as the context for this research. In order to place design
in this wider context, it has been tempting to adopt the mantle Evidence Based Design Evans, 2010) – however
in this research the position of design as phronesis, in a similar manner to health practice (Montgomery, 2005)
is adopted. This allows for an alignment of the work done in both fields, without the problematic associations
with an evidence hierarchy (Gaver & Bowers, 2012; Holmes, Murray, Perron, & Rail, 2006).
The contribution to knowledge is an Open Medical Products Methodology, consisting of the artefacts
supporting the evidence of the methodology’s ability to foster genuine participation amongst those who are
excluded from traditional participatory design. The artefacts constituting this submission are this thesis, the
reflective log kept during the research (Appendix A on page 135), the prototypes from the collaborative
research (Appendix B on page 212), and the online social network that contained the work (AIR1 ).
The Open Medical Products Methodology is expected to be of interest primarily to designers of medical products,
design management and policymakers- although Open Design as a product methodology has appeal to other
sectors and the future work into standardisation, regulation, distributed manufacture and recruitment detailed
at the conclusion of this thesis has application broader than the medical field.
More Information
Statistics
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Share
Actions (login required)
View Item |