MARSON, James (2004). Holes in the safety net? State liability and the need for private law enforcement. Liverpool Law Review, 25 (2), 113-134.
Marson_-_Holes_in_the_Safety_Net_Paper.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License All rights reserved.
Download (179kB) | Preview
Following Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy it was widely considered that State Liability would be an enforcement mechanism that would end the problems the European Court of Justice (ECJ) had contended with through its battle over the adoption or denial of Horizontal Direct Effect of Directives (HDE). In the subsequent years it has been demonstrated that the debate for and against HDE's adoption has continued. This has been due in part to the limitations of State Liability as an effective enforcement mechanism which provides individuals not with their rights, but rather a damages action against the State. This article critiques State Liability and demonstrates the severe limitations which this enforcement mechanism has for those who wish to avail themselves of EC rights denied to them. Such limitations include the piecemeal nature of this method of enforcement; whether cases, particularly from employment law issues, should be heard against the State or the employer causing the problem complained of; and the nature of an enforcement mechanism based on the award of damages. It concludes by analysing this evidence as to whether State Liability is an adequate alternative to HDE, and hence should the enforcement of EC law be brought back from a public law action to the private sphere.
|Research Institute, Centre or Group:||Law and Criminology Research Group|
|Depositing User:||James Marson|
|Date Deposited:||11 Dec 2014 14:57|
|Last Modified:||19 Aug 2015 13:19|
Actions (login required)
Downloads per month over past year