Impossible shadows and lightness constancy

SORANZO, Alessandro and AGOSTINI, Tiziano (2004). Impossible shadows and lightness constancy. Perception, 33, 1359-1368.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (359kB) | Preview
    Official URL: http://www.perceptionweb.com/P.html

    Abstract

    The intersection between an illumination and a reflectance edge is characterised by the `ratio-invariant' property, that is the luminance ratio of the regions under different illumination remains the same. In a CRT experiment, we shaped two areas, one surrounding the other, and simulated an illumination edge dividing them in two frames of illumination. The portion of the illumina- tion edge standing on the surrounding area (labelled contextual background) was the contextual edge, while the portion standing on the enclosed area (labelled mediating background) was the mediating edge. On the mediating background, there were two patches, one per illumination frame. Observers were asked to adjust the luminance of the patch in bright illumination to equate the lightness of the other. We compared conditions in which the luminance ratio at the contextual edge could be (i) equal (possible shadow), or (ii) larger (impossible shadow) than that at the mediating edge. In addition, we manipulated the reflectance of the backgrounds. It could be higher for the contextual than for the mediating background; or, vice versa, lower for the contextual than for the mediating background. Results reveal that lightness constancy significantly increases when: (i) the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge creating an impossible shadow, and (ii) the reflectance of the contextual background is lower than that of the mediating one. We interpret our results according to the albedo hypothesis, and suggest that the scission process is facilitated when the luminance ratio at the contextual edge is larger than that at the mediating edge and/or the reflectance of the including area is lower than that of the included one. This occurs even if the ratio-invariant property is violated.

    Item Type: Article
    Research Institute, Centre or Group: Psychology Research Group
    Depositing User: Alessandro Soranzo
    Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2012 17:21
    Last Modified: 20 Sep 2012 17:21
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6112

    Available Versions of this Item

    • Impossible shadows and lightness constancy. (deposited 20 Sep 2012 17:21)[Currently Displayed]

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics