Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework

KOLADE, Seun, OWOSENI, Adebowale and EGBETOKUN, Abiodun (2024). Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework. Heliyon, 10 (4): e25953.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Kolade-AIChangingLearning(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (853kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Kolade-AIChangingLearning(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (5MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Open Access URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953 (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953

Abstract

ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art chatbot built upon Open AI's generative pre-trained transformer, has generated a major public interest and caused quite a stir in the higher education sector, where reactions have ranged from excitement to consternation. This paper therefore examines the potential impact of ChatGPT on learning and assessment, using the example of academic essays, being a major form of assessment with widespread applications of ChatGPT. This provides an opportunity to unpack broader insights on the challenge of generative AI's to the relevance, quality and credibility of higher education learning in a rapidly changing 21st century knowledge economy. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which we deployed ChatGPT to generate academic essays in response to a typical assessment brief, and then subjected the essays to plagiarism checks and independent grading. The results indicate that ChatGPT is able to generate highly original, and high quality, contents from distinct individual accounts in response to the same assessment brief. However, it is unable to generate multiple original contents from the same account, and it struggled with referencing. The discussion highlights the need for higher education providers to rethink their approach to assessment, in response to disruption precipitated by artificial intelligence. Thus, following the discussion of empirical data, we propose a new conceptual framework for AI-assisted assessment for lifelong learning, in which the parameters of assessment extend beyond knowledge (know what) testing, to competence (know how) assessment and performance (show how) evaluation.

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 12 Feb 2024 15:41
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2024 13:45
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33167

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics