Patient perceptions of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging technology and traditional methods used to assess anthropometry.

NIELD, Lucie, THELWELL, Michael, CHAN, Audrey, CHOPPIN, Simon and MARSHALL, Steven (2024). Patient perceptions of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging technology and traditional methods used to assess anthropometry. Obesity Pillars, 9: 100100.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Nield-PatientPerceptionsOf3D(Vor).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Open Access URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100100

Abstract

Background Obesity and overweight are commonplace, yet attrition rates in weight management clinics are high. Traditional methods of body measurement may be a deterrent due to invasive and time-consuming measurements and negative experiences of how data are presented back to individuals. Emerging new technologies, such as three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging technology, might provide a suitable alternative. This study aimed to understand acceptability of traditional and 3D surface imaging-based body measures, and whether perceptions differ between population groups. Methods This study used a questionnaire to explore body image, body measurement and shape, followed by a qualitative semi-structured interview and first-hand experience of traditional and 3D surface imaging-based body measures. Results 49 participants responded to the questionnaire and 26 participants attended for the body measurements and interview over a 2-month period. There were 3 main themes from the qualitative data 1) Use of technology, 2) Participant experience, expectations and perceptions and 3) Perceived benefits and uses. Conclusion From this study, 3D-surface imaging appeared to be acceptable to patients as a method for anthropometric measurements, which may reduce anxiety and improve attrition rates in some populations. Further work is required to understand the scalability, and the role and implications of these technologies in weight management practice. (University Research Ethics Committee reference number ER41719941).

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100100
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2024 11:54
Last Modified: 13 Feb 2024 10:30
URI: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33129

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics