Baby‐led weaning: a thematic analysis of comments made by parents using online parenting forums

PEARCE, Jo and RUNDLE, Rachel (2022). Baby‐led weaning: a thematic analysis of comments made by parents using online parenting forums. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics.

[img]
Preview
PDF
jhn.13078.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (679kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13...
Open Access URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13078
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Abstract: Background: Baby‐led weaning (BLW) centres on making the baby an active partner, rather than a passive recipient of complementary feeding. Key features of BLW include self‐feeding foods in their natural form, eating with the rest of the family and consuming family foods. This differs from traditional weaning (TW) where parents initially spoon feed purees, alongside finger foods, before graduating to more textured food. Previous research, however, has suggested parents may not fully adhere to one weaning style. The present study aimed to explore how the meaning and interpretation of BLW may contribute to the weaning style used. Methods: Messages and responses posted on three UK parenting forums, and relating to complementary feeding, were analysed using an interpretive thematic approach. Results: The characterisation of BLW by parents was varied, although they described BLW having an ethos which included trusting the baby, role modelling, developing confidence with food and sharing the social aspects of mealtimes. BLW also offered an alternative to those actively seeking something different or a default for those whose baby refused purees or spoon feeding. BLW felt like a natural progression, with low parental effort for some, and a source of anxiety, stress, choking risk and mess for others. Many parents struggled to find a process (what to eat and when) within BLW that they could follow. Finger foods were used synonymously with BLW, but many mixed/blurred aspects of both TW and BLW. Conclusions: The interpretation of BLW varies considerably between parents and a broader definition of BLW may be required, along with guidance on the process and purpose of BLW.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: ** Article version: VoR ** From Wiley via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for VoR version of this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ **Journal IDs: issn 0952-3871; issn 1365-277X **Article IDs: publisher-id: jhn13078 **History: published 16-09-2022; accepted 14-07-2022; submitted 05-01-2022
    Uncontrolled Keywords: ORIGINAL ARTICLE, ORIGINAL ARTICLES, baby‐led weaning, complementary feeding, infant nutrition, parenting, parenting forums, traditional weaning
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13078
    SWORD Depositor: Colin Knott
    Depositing User: Colin Knott
    Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2022 15:42
    Last Modified: 21 Sep 2022 15:42
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/30718

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics