Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade

LAGREE, Andrew, SHINER, Audrey, ALERA, Marie Angeli, FLESHNER, Lauren, LAW, Ethan, LAW, Brianna, LU, Fang-I, DODINGTON, David, GANDHI, Sonal, SLODKOWSKA, Elzbieta A., SHENFIELD, Alex, JERZAK, Katarzyna J., SADEGHI-NAINI, Ali and TRAN, William T. (2021). Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade. Current Oncology, 28 (6), 4298-4316.

[img]
Preview
PDF
curroncol-28-00366.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (6MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/28/6/366
Open Access URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/28/6/366/pdf (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Background: Evaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence. Methods: There were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Multiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836. Conclusion: These results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Oncology & Carcinogenesis; 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060366
    Page Range: 4298-4316
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2021 10:51
    Last Modified: 28 Oct 2021 11:00
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29222

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics