The Human Muscle Size and Strength Relationship. Effects of Architecture, Muscle Force and Measurement Location.

BALSHAW, Thomas G, MADEN-WILKINSON, Tom, MASSEY, Garry J and FOLLAND, Jonathan P (2021). The Human Muscle Size and Strength Relationship. Effects of Architecture, Muscle Force and Measurement Location. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[img] PDF
Maden-Wilkinson-HumanMuscleSize(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 April 2022.
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (975kB)
Official URL: https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/9000/T...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002691
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Purpose This study aimed to determine the best muscle size index of muscle strength by establishing if incorporating muscle architecture measurements improved the human muscle size-strength relationship. The influence of calculating muscle force, and the location of anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) measurements on this relationship were also examined. Methods Fifty-two recreationally active males completed unilateral isometric knee extension strength assessments and MRI scans of the dominant thigh and knee to determine quadriceps femoris (QF) size variables (ACSA along the length of the femur, maximum ACSA [ACSAMAX] and volume [VOL]) and patellar tendon moment arm. Ultrasound images (2 sites per constituent muscle) were analyzed to quantify muscle architecture (fascicle length, pennation angle), and when combined with VOL (from MRI), facilitated calculation of QF effective PCSA (EFFPCSA) as potentially the best muscle size determinant of strength. Muscle force was calculated by dividing maximum voluntary torque (MVT) by the moment arm and addition of antagonist torque (derived from hamstring EMG). Results The associations of EFFPCSA (r=0.685), ACSAMAX (r=0.697), or VOL (r=0.773) with strength did not differ, although qualitatively VOL explained 59.8% of the variance in strength, ~11-13% greater than EFFPCSA or ACSAMAX. All muscle size variables had weaker associations with muscle force than MVT. The association of strength-ACSA at 65% of femur length (r=0.719) was greater than for ACSA measured between 10-55% and 75-90% (r=-0.042-0.633) of femur length. Conclusions In conclusion, using contemporary methods to assess muscle architecture and calculate EFFPCSA did not enhance the muscle strength-size association. For understanding/monitoring muscle size, the major determinant of strength, these findings support the assessment of muscle volume, that is independent of architecture measurements, and was most highly correlated to strength.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Sport Sciences; 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences; 1116 Medical Physiology; 1117 Public Health and Health Services
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002691
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 04 May 2021 16:30
    Last Modified: 04 May 2021 16:30
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28606

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics