A systematic review of exercise testing in patients with intermittent claudication: A focus on test standardisation and reporting quality in randomised controlled trials of exercise interventions

BIRKETT, Stefan T., HARWOOD, Amy E., CALDOW, Edward, IBEGGAZENE, Said, INGLE, Lee and PYMER, Sean (2021). A systematic review of exercise testing in patients with intermittent claudication: A focus on test standardisation and reporting quality in randomised controlled trials of exercise interventions. PLOS ONE, 16 (5).

[img]
Preview
PDF
pone.0249277.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Archive (ZIP) (6 additional files)
Ibeggazene-SystematicReviewExercise(Supp).zip - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (81kB)
Open Access URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.13... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249277
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    A systematic review was conducted to identify the range of terminology used in studies to describe maximum walking distance and the exercise testing protocols, and testing modalities used to measure it in patients with intermittent claudication. A secondary aim was to assess the implementation and reporting of the exercise testing protocols. CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Randomised controlled trials whereby patients with intermittent claudication were randomised to an exercise intervention were included. The terminology used to describe maximal walking distance was recorded, as was the modality and protocol used to measure it. The implementation and reporting quality was also assessed using pre-specified criteria. Sixty-four trials were included in this review. Maximal walking distance was reported using fourteen different terminologies. Twenty-two different treadmill protocols and three different corridor tests were employed to assess maximal walking distance. No single trial satisfied all the implementation and reporting criteria for an exercise testing protocol. Evidence shows that between-study interpretation is difficult given the heterogenous nature of the exercise testing protocols, test endpoints and terminology used to describe maximal walking distance. This is further compounded by poor test reporting and implementation across studies. Comprehensive guidelines need to be provided to enable a standardised approach to exercise testing in patients with intermittent claudication.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: ** From PLOS via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ **Journal IDs: eissn 1932-6203 **Article IDs: publisher-id: pone-d-20-40047 **History: published_online 03-05-2021; accepted 15-03-2021; collection 2021; submitted 22-12-2020
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Research Article, Biology and life sciences, Medicine and health sciences, Research and analysis methods, Engineering and technology
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249277
    SWORD Depositor: Colin Knott
    Depositing User: Colin Knott
    Date Deposited: 05 May 2021 14:38
    Last Modified: 05 May 2021 14:45
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28601

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics