Assessing fidelity of a community based psychosocial intervention for people with mild dementia within a large randomised controlled trial

SPRANGE, Kirsty, BERESFORD-DENT, Jules, MOUNTAIN, Gail, CRAIG, Claire, MASON, Clare, BERRY, Katherine, WRIGHT, Jessica, MAJID, Shazmin, THOMAS, Ben and COOPER, Cindy L. (2021). Assessing fidelity of a community based psychosocial intervention for people with mild dementia within a large randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 21 (1), p. 119.

[img]
Preview
PDF
12877_2021_Article_2070.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (626kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
12877_2021_2070_MOESM1_ESM.pdf - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (313kB) | Preview
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02070-8
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Abstract: Background: Understanding intervention delivery as intended, particularly in complex interventions, should be underpinned by good quality fidelity assessment. We present the findings from a fidelity assessment embedded as part of a trial of a complex community-based psychosocial intervention, Journeying through Dementia (JtD). The intervention was designed to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills to successfully self-manage, maintain independence, and live well with dementia and involves both group and individual sessions. The methodological challenges of developing a conceptual framework for fidelity assessment and creating and applying purposely designed measures derived from this framework are discussed to inform future studies. Methods: A conceptual fidelity framework was created out of core components of the intervention (including the intervention manual and training for delivery), associated trial protocols and pre-defined fidelity standards and criteria against which intervention delivery and receipt could be measured. Fidelity data collection tools were designed and piloted for reliability and usability. Data collection in four selected sites (fidelity sites) was via non-participatory observations of the group aspect of the intervention, attendance registers and interventionist (facilitator and supervisor) self-report. Results: Interventionists from all four fidelity sites attended intervention training. The majority of group participants at the four sites (71%) received the therapeutic dose of 10 out of 16 sessions. Weekly group meeting attendance (including at ‘out of venue’ sessions) was excellent at 80%. Additionally, all but one individual session was attended by the participants who completed the intervention. It proved feasible to create tools derived from the fidelity framework to assess in-venue group aspects of this complex intervention. Results of fidelity assessment of the observed groups were good with substantial inter-rater reliability between researchers KAPPA 0.68 95% CI (0.58–0.78). Self-report by interventionists concurred with researcher assessments. Conclusions: There was good fidelity to training and delivery of the group aspect of the intervention at four sites. However, the methodological challenges of assessing all aspects of this complex intervention could not be overcome due to practicalities, assessment methods and ethical considerations. Questions remain regarding how we can assess fidelity in community-based complex interventions without impacting upon intervention or trial delivery. Trial registration: ISRCTN17993825.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: ** From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ **Journal IDs: eissn 1471-2318 **Article IDs: publisher-id: s12877-021-02070-8; manuscript: 2070 **History: collection 12-2021; published 11-02-2021; online 11-02-2021; registration 04-02-2021; accepted 02-02-2021; submitted 25-11-2020
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Research Article, Complex intervention, Self-management, Dementia, Fidelity assessment
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02070-8
    Page Range: p. 119
    SWORD Depositor: Colin Knott
    Depositing User: Colin Knott
    Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2021 15:43
    Last Modified: 17 Mar 2021 15:02
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/28148

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics