Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: The Age Gap Trial

TODD, Annaliza, MARTIN, Charlene, MORGAN, Jenna, HERBERT, Esther, BRADBURN, Mike, BURTON, Maria, REED, Malcolm W.R., CHATER, Tim, PEMBERTON, Kirsty, WALTERS, Stephen, CHEUNG, Kwok Leung, AUDISIO, Riccardo A., RING, Alistair, ROBINSON, Thompson, GREEN, Tracy, GATH, Jacqui and WYLD, Lynda (2020). Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: The Age Gap Trial. Journal of Geriatric Oncology.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Burton_AgeSpecificRecruitment(InPress).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (808kB) | Preview
Open Access URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/... (Published version)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.015
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Introduction Recruitment and retention are two of the most important factors in successfully running clinical trials. Many trials encounter problems with both, causing delays or preventing study progress. These issues are greater in older adults and patients with cancer. Materials and methods We assessed recruitment and retention in a large, multicentre, observational breast cancer study in older female patients (>70 years, N = 3440). Data collected by the Age Gap study were used to assess rates of, and reasons for, patients not being recruited or retained. Statistical analysis assessed the impact of age as a predictor of recruitment and retention. Results Between February 2013 and June 2018, 6876 patients were screened and 3456 were consented across 56 United Kingdom (UK) breast units. Reasons for non-recruitment included ineligibility, clinician issues, staffing resource issues, patients' lack of interest or time and trial burden. In comparison with the age demographics of patients with breast cancer in the UK, women aged 70–75 years were over-represented compared to older age groups. Logistic regression demonstrated that older age significantly reduced the odds of consent (OR = 0.96, CI: 0.938–0.982; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), markers of poor functional ability (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.011)) and instrumental activities of daily living (p = 0.026) were significant predictors of withdrawal. Discussion This study has demonstrated that selection and attrition bias for age are apparent despite a range of ‘age friendly’ study design measures. Exploration of the underlying reasons for this and development of measures to address this should be the focus of further research.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: ** Article version: AM ** From Elsevier via Jisc Publications Router ** Licence for AM version of this article starting on 26-10-2020: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ **Journal IDs: issn 18794068 **History: issue date 27-10-2020; accepted 21-10-2020
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.015
    SWORD Depositor: Colin Knott
    Depositing User: Colin Knott
    Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2020 11:13
    Last Modified: 17 Mar 2021 21:30
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27517

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics