A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport

PETRÓCZI, A., BACKHOUSE, S.H., BARKOUKIS, V., BRAND, R., ELBE, A.M., LAZURAS, Lambros and LUCIDI, F. (2015). A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26 (11), 1130-1139.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Lazuras-CallPolicyGuidance(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (616kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.022
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    © 2015 Elsevier B.V. One of the fundamental challenges in anti-doping is identifying athletes who use, or are at risk of using, prohibited performance enhancing substances. The growing trend to employ a forensic approach to doping control aims to integrate information from social sciences (e.g., psychology of doping) into organised intelligence to protect clean sport. Beyond the foreseeable consequences of a positive identification as a doping user, this task is further complicated by the discrepancy between what constitutes a doping offence in the World Anti-Doping Code and operationalized in doping research. Whilst psychology plays an important role in developing our understanding of doping behaviour in order to inform intervention and prevention, its contribution to the array of doping diagnostic tools is still in its infancy. In both research and forensic settings, we must acknowledge that (1) socially desirable responding confounds self-reported psychometric test results and (2) that the cognitive complexity surrounding test performance means that the response-time based measures and the lie detector tests for revealing concealed life-events (e.g., doping use) are prone to produce false or non-interpretable outcomes in field settings. Differences in social-cognitive characteristics of doping behaviour that are tested at group level (doping users vs. non-users) cannot be extrapolated to individuals; nor these psychometric measures used for individual diagnostics. In this paper, we present a position statement calling for policy guidance on appropriate use of psychometric assessments in the pursuit of clean sport. We argue that, to date, both self-reported and response-time based psychometric tests for doping have been designed, tested and validated to explore how athletes feel and think about doping in order to develop a better understanding of doping behaviour, not to establish evidence for doping. A false 'positive' psychological profile for doping affects not only the individual 'clean' athlete but also their entourage, their organisation and sport itself. The proposed policy guidance aims to protect the global athletic community against social, ethical and legal consequences from potential misuse of psychological tests, including erroneous or incompetent applications as forensic diagnostic tools in both practice and research.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Prohibited performance enhancement; Athlete; Drug; Anti-doping; Attitude; Anti-doping; Athlete; Attitude; Drug; Prohibited performance enhancement; Athletes; Cognition; Doping in Sports; Humans; Performance-Enhancing Substances; Policy; Psychometrics; Humans; Cognition; Psychometrics; Doping in Sports; Athletes; Policy; Performance-Enhancing Substances; 11 Medical and Health Sciences; 16 Studies in Human Society; 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences; Substance Abuse
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.022
    Page Range: 1130-1139
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 21 Apr 2021 15:51
    Last Modified: 21 Apr 2021 16:00
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27144

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics