Social identity differentiation predicts commitment to sobriety and wellbeing in residents of therapeutic communities

DINGLE, G A, HASLAM, C, BEST, D, CHAN, G, STAIGER, PK, SAVIC, M, BECKWITH, M, MACKENZIE, J, BATHISH, R and LUBMAN, DI (2019). Social identity differentiation predicts commitment to sobriety and wellbeing in residents of therapeutic communities. Social Science & Medicine, 237, p. 112459.

[img] PDF
Best Social identity differentiation predicts commitment to sobriety.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 August 2020.
All rights reserved.

Download (389kB)
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112459

Abstract

© 2019 Rationale: Therapeutic communities (TC) for alcohol and other drug treatment rely strongly on social factors as agents of recovery; an approach known as ‘community-as-method’. This study adopted a social identity approach in examining the relative strength of participants' recovery group identity and substance using group identity at admission (T1) and after six months (T2) in a TC. Objectives: Were to investigate whether identity differentiation – the extent to which respondents see themselves more as belonging to recovery groups than belonging to substance using groups – (a) is related to individuals' primary substance of concern (i.e., amphetamine type stimulants; alcohol; other drugs), and (b) predicts positive indicators of recovery six months after entering a therapeutic community. Method: Adults (N = 307) entering one of five Australian therapeutic communities (TC) completed measures of identification (user, recovery), commitment to sobriety, psychological distress, and personal wellbeing. Results: Participants' endorsement of the user and recovery identity at T1 and T2 did not differ as a function of primary substance of concern. User identity diminished over the six months while recovery identity remained high, regardless of primary drug category. Identity differentiation measured at T2 accounted for 20–25% variance in commitment to sobriety and wellbeing, after accounting for participant demographics, addiction severity, and T1 identity variables. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of the relative strength of recovery over substance use related identities in supporting recovery indicators and the central role of the TC in supporting this trajectory.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Commitment to sobriety; Identity differentiation; Recovery identity; Social identity; Therapeutic community; Wellbeing; 1117 Public Health and Health Services; 1601 Anthropology; 1608 Sociology; Public Health
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112459
Page Range: p. 112459
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2019 11:37
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2019 11:45
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/25203

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics