LUO, Q. and JONES, A. H. (2010). High-precision determination of residual stress of polycrystalline coatings using optimised XRD-sin2ψ technique. Surface & Coatings Technology, 205, 1403-1408.
|
Image (TIFF)
fig-1.TIF Download (726kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image (TIFF)
fig-2a.TIF Download (631kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image (TIFF)
fig-2b.TIF Download (568kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image (TIFF)
fig-_2c.TIF Download (389kB) | Preview |
|
|
Image (TIFF)
fig-3.TIF Download (604kB) | Preview |
|
|
PDF
Stress_manuscript-5.pdf - Accepted Version Download (402kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aim of the research is to optimise the XRD-sin2ψ technique in order to perform high precision measurement of surface residual stress. Residual stresses existing in most hard coatings have significant influence on the adhesion, mechanical properties and tribological performance. In the XRD-sin2ψ stress measurement, the residual stress value is determined through a linear regression between two parameters derived from experimentally measured diffraction angle (2θ). Thus, the precision coefficient (R2) of the linear regression reflects the accuracy of the stress measurement, which depends strongly on how precise the 2θ values are measured out of a group of very broad diffraction peaks. In this research, XRD experiments were conducted on a number of samples, including an electron beam evaporated ZrO2 based thermal barrier coating, several magnetron sputtered transitionmetal nitride coatings, and shot-peened superalloy components. In each case, the diffraction peak position was determined using different methods, namely, the maximum intensity (Imax) method, the middle point of half maximum (MPHM) intensity method, the gravity centre method, and the parabolic approaching method. The results reveal that the R2 values varied between 0.25 and 0.99, depending on both the tested materials and the method of the 2θ value determination. The parabolic approaching method showed the best linear regression with R2=0.93±0.07, leading to high precision of the determined residual stress value in all cases; both the MPHM (R2=0.86±0.16) and gravity centre (R2=0.91±0.11) methods also gave good results in most cases; and the Imax method (R2=0.71±0.27) exhibited substantial uncertainty depending on the nature of individual XRD scans.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Contributors: | Author - make_name_string expected hash reference Author - make_name_string expected hash reference |
Research Institute, Centre or Group - Does NOT include content added after October 2018: | Materials and Engineering Research Institute > Materials Analysis and Research Services Materials and Engineering Research Institute > Advanced Coatings and Composites Research Centre > Nanotechnology Centre for PVD Research |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.108 |
Page Range: | 1403-1408 |
Depositing User: | Quanshun Luo |
Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2010 09:21 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2021 14:05 |
URI: | https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2479 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year