Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review

SAGE, Karen, BROOMFIELD, Katherine, HARROP, Deborah, JUDGE, Simon and JONES, Georgina (2019). Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review. Quality of Life Research.

[img] PDF
Sage-AppraisingQualityTools(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 June 2020.
All rights reserved.

Download (358kB)
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11136...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3

Abstract

Purpose People who have complex communication needs (CCN), and who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to help them express themselves, can be difficult to engage in decision making about their healthcare. The purpose of this review was to identify what patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been employed with people who use AAC. Of the tools identified, the review aimed to establish what conceptual frameworks were used and how the reports describe completion of the PROM. Methods A systematic literature review was carried out. A pre-defined set of search terms was entered into five main health and education databases. Titles and abstracts were sifted for relevance. Full text papers were screened against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data pertaining to the type and nature of the PROM used was extracted. Complementary data sources were analysed to construct a narrative synthesis of the papers identified. Results Within 15 papers that met the review criteria, 25 PROMs were used with people who rely on AAC comprising of 15 separate measures. The conceptual frameworks for 12 of these tools were reported from which 62 items, or concepts being measured, were identified. Following synthesis of these items, 9 conceptual domains and 11 sub-domains were generated. Limited information was available about who completed the PROM nor how much, if any, support they received. Conclusions No PROM that has been developed specifically for people who use AAC was identified by this review. Of the tools that have been used with people who use AAC, the concepts measured were broad and varied. The quality of reporting concerning who completed the PROM was limited, undermining the trustworthiness of many of the studies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Health Policy & Services; 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3
SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2019 12:43
Last Modified: 25 Jun 2019 09:30
URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24661

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics