Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review

BROOMFIELD, Katherine, HARROP, Deborah, JUDGE, Simon, JONES, Georgina and SAGE, Karen (2019). Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review. Quality of Life Research.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Sage-AppraisingQualityTools(VoR).pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (616kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11136...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Purpose People who have complex communication needs (CCN), and who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to help them express themselves, can be difficult to engage in decision making about their healthcare. The purpose of this review was to identify what patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been employed with people who use AAC. Of the tools identified, the review aimed to establish what conceptual frameworks were used and how the reports describe completion of the PROM. Methods A systematic literature review was carried out. A pre-defined set of search terms was entered into five main health and education databases. Titles and abstracts were sifted for relevance. Full text papers were screened against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data pertaining to the type and nature of the PROM used was extracted. Complementary data sources were analysed to construct a narrative synthesis of the papers identified. Results Within 15 papers that met the review criteria, 25 PROMs were used with people who rely on AAC comprising of 15 separate measures. The conceptual frameworks for 12 of these tools were reported from which 62 items, or concepts being measured, were identified. Following synthesis of these items, 9 conceptual domains and 11 sub-domains were generated. Limited information was available about who completed the PROM nor how much, if any, support they received. Conclusions No PROM that has been developed specifically for people who use AAC was identified by this review. Of the tools that have been used with people who use AAC, the concepts measured were broad and varied. The quality of reporting concerning who completed the PROM was limited, undermining the trustworthiness of many of the studies.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Health Policy & Services; 1117 Public Health and Health Services
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 05 Jun 2019 12:43
    Last Modified: 17 Jun 2020 16:01
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24661

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics