“Catch 22”: biosecurity awareness, interpretation and practice amongst poultry catchers

MILLMAN, Caroline, CHRISTLEY, R, RIGBY, D, DENNIS, D, O'BRIEN, SJ and WILLIAMS, N (2017). “Catch 22”: biosecurity awareness, interpretation and practice amongst poultry catchers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 141, 22-32.

[img]
Preview
PDF
1-s2.0-S0167587717302933-main.pdf - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (745kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Open Access URL: https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271186/1-s2.0-... (Published)
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.04.002
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Campylobacter contamination of chicken on sale in the UK remains at high levels and has a substantial public health impact. This has prompted the application of many interventions in the supply chain, including enhanced biosecurity measures on-farm. Catching and thinning are acknowledged as threats to the maintenance of good biosecurity, yet the people employed to undertake this critical work (i.e. ‘catchers’) are a rarely studied group. This study uses a mixed methods approach to investigate catchers’ (n = 53) understanding of the biosecurity threats posed by the catching and thinning, and the barriers to good biosecurity practice. It interrogated the role of training in both the awareness and practice of good biosecurity. Awareness of lapses in biosecurity was assessed using a Watch-&-Click hazard awareness survey (n = 53). Qualitative interviews (n = 49 catchers, 5 farm managers) explored the understanding, experience and practice of catching and biosecurity. All of the catchers who took part in the Watch-&-Click study identified at least one of the biosecurity threats with 40% detecting all of the hazards. Those who had undergone training were significantly more likely to identify specific biosecurity threats and have a higher awareness score overall (48% compared to 9%, p = 0.03). Crucially, the individual and group interviews revealed the tensions between the high levels of biosecurity awareness evident from the survey and the reality of the routine practice of catching and thinning. Time pressures and a lack of equipment rather than a lack of knowledge appear a more fundamental cause of catcher-related biosecurity lapses. Our results reveal that catchers find themselves in a ‘catch-22′ situation in which mutually conflicting circumstances prevent simultaneous completion of their job and compliance with biosecurity standards.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Campylobacter; Biosecurity; Hazard awareness; Poultry; Catching crew; Biosecurity; Campylobacter; Catching crew; Hazard awareness; Poultry; Adult; Agriculture; Animal Culling; Animal Husbandry; Animals; Campylobacter; Chickens; Farmers; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Meat-Packing Industry; Surveys and Questionnaires; Animals; Chickens; Humans; Campylobacter; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Agriculture; Animal Husbandry; Meat-Packing Industry; Adult; Animal Culling; Surveys and Questionnaires; Farmers; Veterinary Sciences; 0707 Veterinary Sciences
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.04.002
    Page Range: 22-32
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 07 Jan 2020 16:08
    Last Modified: 07 Jan 2020 16:15
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24481

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics