Dietary management of celiac disease: revisiting the guidelines

THEODORIDIS, Xenophon, GRAMMATIKOPOULOU, Maria G, PETALIDOU, Arianna, PATELIDA, Maria, GKIOURAS, Konstantinos, KLONIZAKIS, Markos, PITTAS, Stefanos and BOGDANOS, Dimitrios P (2019). Dietary management of celiac disease: revisiting the guidelines. Nutrition.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Klonizakis-DietaryManagementCeliac(AM).pdf - Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (678kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Klonizakis-DietaryManagementCeliac(Supplemental).pdf - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (183kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Klonizakis-DietaryManagementCeliac(Supplemental2).pdf - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (101kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF
Klonizakis-DietaryManagementCeliac(Supplemental3).pdf - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (208kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...
Link to published version:: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2019.04.008
Related URLs:

    Abstract

    Objective: Medical nutrition therapy (MNT), by lifelong compliance to a gluten free diet, is the only treatment of celiac disease (CD). Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding the management of CD emphasize on the role of MNT besides other treatment options. The aim of the present study was to review and critically appraise CD-specific MNT CPGs, and identify the areas in need of improvement for better adherence a¬¬nd outcomes. Research Methods & Procedures: A comprehensive search was performed at Pubmed, Guidelines International Network (GIN), Google Scholar and related websites for CPGs on the dietary management of CD, published in the English language. Results: A total of 12 CPGs were retrieved and critically appraised by three independent reviewers utilizing the AGREE II instrument. All CPGs were of low quality based on AGREE II tool. Among the 12 CPGs, the NICE ones achieved the highest score and was unanimously recommended without modifications by the three reviews, while AGA, AHS, BSPGHAN, CREST and FISPGHAN CPGs received the lowest score. Conclusions: The present study unveils the low quality of guidelines regarding the MNT of CD patients, indicating the need of updated and improved guidelines taking into consideration the proposed items of the AGREE II. Keywords: medical nutrition therapy; clinical practice; critical appraisal; gluten-free diet; autoimmune disease; nutrition intervention; evidence-based nutrition; gluten; CASP.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: 11 Medical and Health Sciences; Nutrition & Dietetics
    Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2019.04.008
    SWORD Depositor: Symplectic Elements
    Depositing User: Symplectic Elements
    Date Deposited: 17 Apr 2019 11:07
    Last Modified: 18 Mar 2021 02:00
    URI: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/24478

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year

    View more statistics